Permitted Development, in one paragraph
In England, the General Permitted Development Order (GPDO) lets most homeowners add a loft conversion, single-storey rear extension up to 6 metres, side extensions, or solar panels without applying for planning permission. The catch: those rights are not universal. They are stripped or restricted whenever the property falls inside any of a short list of designated areas. We mapped the country to find out where they still apply.
What strips PD rights
The five mechanisms that take away permitted-development rights from a "normal" residential property:
1.Conservation Areas. Roof alterations, side extensions, cladding, satellite dishes, and certain rear extensions all need consent. 11,094 conservation-area polygons in England.
2.Article 4 Directions. Local councils can remove specific PD rights borough-wide, or for individual streets. 6,850 Article 4 areas in England — Hillingdon, Camden and Birmingham are particularly aggressive users.
3.National Parks. PD rights are tightly curtailed; even fence height can need consent. England has 10.
4.Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (now called National Landscapes). Side extensions and roof alterations restricted. 34 in England.
5.World Heritage Sites. Side extensions and roof alterations restricted; cumulative-impact tests apply. England has 40 designated WHS polygons plus 9 buffer zones.
Listed buildings strip the rights too, but at property level rather than area level — that's a separate problem and we cover it in the planning-restricted streets piece.
Methodology
+For each England postcode (sample: 480,000 postcodes spanning London, North East, East Midlands, Yorkshire, West Midlands, Bristol, Bath, the parts of the South West reachable through these prefixes), we asked: does the centroid sit inside any conservation area, Article 4 area, national park, AONB or WHS?
+If yes → PD lost for that postcode.
+For each outcode with ≥100 postcodes sampled, we computed the % of postcodes with PD intact.
+Reference source for the polygons: planning.data.gov.uk mirror, 11 May 2026.
Caveats:
+We treat the *area* as the filter. Individual listed buildings are not in this analysis. A 100%-PD-intact outcode can still contain individual listed houses.
+This is England only. Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland have their own rules and datasets.
+Postcode centroid containment ≠ property-level. A property at the edge of a conservation area may sit just outside or just inside.
Top 50 PD-friendly outcodes
Outcodes with 100% PD intact in our sample, ranked by sample size:
OutcodeBorough / LADPostcodes analysedPD intact
M34Tameside1,100100%
DE24Derby1,056100%
B90Solihull992100%
NG31South Kesteven (Grantham)934100%
SR4Sunderland867100%
TS19Stockton-on-Tees860100%
SR5Sunderland785100%
RM3Havering778100%
E16Newham771100%
TS6Redcar and Cleveland746100%
TS3Middlesbrough739100%
UB6Ealing733100%
M23Manchester (Wythenshawe)718100%
IG1Redbridge (Ilford)710100%
B91Solihull675100%
BD6Bradford671100%
BS14Bristol654100%
NE63Northumberland (Ashington)650100%
PE10South Kesteven (Bourne)612100%
B71Sandwell610100%
DA7Bexley601100%
S20Sheffield578100%
PE25East Lindsey (Skegness)574100%
CR7Croydon (Thornton Heath)560100%
S13Sheffield550100%
M43Tameside (Droylsden)550100%
B68Sandwell (Oldbury)545100%
DA16Bexley (Welling)543100%
M11Manchester (Clayton)538100%
LE13Melton (Mowbray)524100%
SM2Sutton521100%
S9Sheffield517100%
UB1Ealing (Southall)510100%
E13Newham (Plaistow)490100%
B65Sandwell466100%
B93Warwick (Knowle)460100%
NE37Sunderland (Washington)442100%
M44Salford (Cadishead)427100%
NE13North Tyneside417100%
LN12East Lindsey (Mablethorpe)401100%
SE2Greenwich (Abbey Wood)400100%
B64Sandwell (Cradley Heath)379100%
IG2Redbridge (Gants Hill)373100%
SE28Bexley (Thamesmead)359100%
TW4Hounslow356100%
KT9Kingston (Chessington)351100%
M13Manchester (Longsight)349100%
BR4Bromley (West Wickham)338100%
NG33South Kesteven (Colsterworth)333100%
B49Stratford-on-Avon (Alcester)315100%
There are more 100%-PD outcodes than 50 in our sample — those above are the largest by population. The pattern is clear: post-war suburban estates, working-class districts that pre-date the conservation-area expansion of the 1980s, and new-build areas on the Thames Estuary.
Top 50 most-restricted outcodes
Outcodes with 0% PD intact — every analysed postcode sits inside at least one of the five area-level designations:
OutcodeBorough / LADPostcodesPD intact
E17Waltham Forest (Walthamstow)1,2320%
NW3Camden (Hampstead)1,1160%
NW1Camden1,1030%
M27Salford (Swinton)9930%
EN5Barnet (Barnet)8690%
W2Kensington and Chelsea / Westminster8680%
EN3Enfield8470%
E4Waltham Forest (Chingford)8260%
UB3Hillingdon (Hayes)8130%
EN1Enfield8070%
N9Enfield (Edmonton)7660%
SE6Lewisham (Catford)7400%
EN2Enfield7330%
NW11Barnet (Golders Green)7210%
B23Birmingham (Erdington)7080%
NW8Westminster (St Johns Wood)6770%
NW7Barnet (Mill Hill)6700%
B29Birmingham (Selly Oak)6680%
SW3Kensington and Chelsea (Chelsea)6650%
M6Salford6470%
UB10Hillingdon (Ickenham)6450%
UB8Hillingdon (Uxbridge)6200%
N14Enfield (Southgate)6160%
UB4Hillingdon (Hayes)6130%
NW4Barnet (Hendon)6110%
N12Barnet (Woodside Park)6060%
B44Birmingham (Kingstanding)6060%
B13Birmingham (Moseley)6050%
B33Birmingham (Kitts Green)5940%
N3Barnet (Finchley)5430%
UB7Hillingdon (West Drayton)5350%
W8Kensington and Chelsea5330%
B11Birmingham (Sparkhill)5200%
B17Birmingham (Harborne)5200%
EN4Barnet (Cockfosters)5180%
RM10Barking and Dagenham5100%
B30Birmingham (Stirchley)5090%
B24Birmingham (Erdington)5070%
N21Enfield (Winchmore Hill)5070%
B8Birmingham (Saltley)4890%
E10Waltham Forest (Leyton)4850%
N20Barnet (Whetstone)4790%
B76Birmingham (Sutton Coldfield)4740%
B20Birmingham (Handsworth Wood)4670%
W9Westminster (Maida Vale)4650%
HA6Hillingdon (Northwood)4630%
SW7Westminster (South Kensington)4590%
BS1Bristol4390%
W1KWestminster (Mayfair)4180%
W1TWestminster (Fitzrovia)4050%
The borough effect
The same outcodes that scored worst in our planning-restricted streets piece reappear here, but the drivers are subtly different. Three boroughs dominate the "0% PD" list:
Enfield (EN1/EN2/EN3/EN4/EN5/N9/N14/N21) — Article 4 saturation. Enfield Council has imposed borough-wide Article 4 directions covering HMOs, change of use to dwellings, and front-garden parking. Every postcode in the borough is effectively inside an Article 4 area. Combined with the wide spread of small conservation areas covering individual roads (Forty Hall, Bush Hill Park, Trent Park edges), there is essentially no PD-intact territory left.
Hillingdon (UB3/UB4/UB7/UB8/UB10/HA6) — same playbook. Five overlapping borough-wide Article 4 directions, as we noted in the planning-restricted streets piece. Then add the Colne Valley Regional Park and the Heathrow-related AQMA. The result: ~620,000 postcodes in our sample with 0% PD intact.
Birmingham (B-postcodes from 8 to 44 to 76) — heritage breadth. Birmingham has 30 conservation areas plus a city-wide Article 4 direction covering HMO conversions. The B-prefix dominates the 0% list because the council's designation footprint is so wide.
By contrast, the 100%-PD outcodes cluster in three patterns:
+Post-war Outer London — Bexley (DA7, DA16, SE2, SE28), Havering (RM3), Newham (E13, E16), Croydon (CR7), Bromley (BR4), Kingston (KT9). Estates built between 1945 and 1970 typically post-date the conservation-area expansion.
+North East and Tees Valley regeneration corridors — TS3, TS6, TS19, SR4, SR5, NE13, NE37, NE63. Heavy redevelopment, few intact pre-war street patterns.
+Sandwell and post-industrial West Midlands — B49, B64, B65, B68, B71, B91, B93. Knowle (B93) is the exception in the cluster: still PD-intact despite affluent suburban character, presumably because Warwick District Council hasn't placed an Article 4 direction here yet.
What this means for you as a buyer
If you bought a Victorian house in NW3 expecting to add a loft conversion using PD rules, you can't. The whole of NW3 is in a conservation area. If you bought the same house in M34 Tameside, you almost certainly can — full GPDO rights apply unless something at the property level (listed status, restrictive covenant, neighbour party-wall objection) bites.
Three checks before you offer on anything where PD matters to your plans:
1.Pull the area-level designations. Our free area pages list every relevant polygon — conservation area name, Article 4 direction reference, AONB membership. 2.Pull the property-level checks. Is it individually listed? Does the title have restrictive covenants? Our paid £14.95 report lists statutory designations for an address. 3.Check whether your specific PD operation is the one that's been removed. Article 4 directions are surgical — they often remove change-of-use rights or front-garden parking but leave loft conversions alone. The direction text matters; "Article 4 area" alone doesn't tell you which rights are stripped.
Outcode-level breakdowns for areas mentioned above:
Caveats again
The 100%-PD outcodes are not loft-conversion-paradise. They are *area-level-PD-paradise*. You still have to confirm at property level:
+No listing
+No restrictive covenant on title
+No party-wall issue
+Loft has the structural capacity (≥2.3m headroom typically)
+Roof type (Victorian rear-addition vs modern truss) — the latter is much more complex
What we've measured is the absence of statutory area designations that would override PD rights. Everything else is on you.
Sources
+MHCLG planning practice guidance on Article 4 directions
+Boundaries: ONS Geography Portal, November 2025
Related